Closed

Academic Writing ( ESSAY)

This project received 32 bids from talented freelancers with an average bid price of $94 AUD.

Get free quotes for a project like this
Employer working
Skills Required
Project Budget
$30 - $250 AUD
Total Bids
32
Project Description

Assessment Description:
Part A (1500 words – 35% of the total mark for the unit)
In 1500 words discuss the pros and cons of the deinstitutionalisation that commenced in the 1980s
and that has led to mixed and controversial outcomes. Describe and discuss this controversy using
the views of the key stakeholders. Here are some additional points to address:
Compare the Australian situation with one in a country that has either not implemented
deinstitutionalisation in the mental health sector, or where it has led to significantly
different outcomes.
Pay attention to the ‘side-effects’ of this practice, such as an increase in the prescription of
different medication or social changes that have emerged from the necessity to care for
people with mental illness in the community.
Avoid fuzzy thinking and the repetition of information through using a concise heading
structure and paragraphs.
Support your arguments with a minimum of 15 quality references.
Part B (500 words – 15% of the total mark for the unit)
In refering to Activity 4.4 in the Study Guide, choose one of the personality disorders mentioned in
George Boeree’s text other than paranoid personality disorder, and outline the traumatic
experiences that are likely and typically have contributed to the formation of the symptoms typical
for the disorder. Support your arguments with a minimum of three quality references. Consult the
HWF Academic Writing Guide 2013 for referencing guidelines (see link under
Assessments section of Unit).
Please note that you will have to also study part of Section 5 to successfully complete this task.

Looking to make some money?

  • Set your budget and the timeframe
  • Outline your proposal
  • Get paid for your work

Hire Freelancers who also bid on this project

    • Forbes
    • The New York Times
    • Time
    • Wall Street Journal
    • Times Online