In Progress

paper Statistica Critique a PHD paper

Attached is paper and I would like you to go over it and write a critique report about the Quantitative methods used in this paper.

you should highlight he below points as your main headings:

1. Brief overview (includes research questions/purpose)

2. Research approach and methodologies used

3. How well the methods used helped to achieve objectives of the articles.

4. any suggestions for improvement in the methods used or for extensions to the work

you should have professional degree to do such critique with sufficient knowledge in Quantitative analysis and methods.

Due date 4 days after the awarding

Skills: Business Analysis, Management, Mathematics, Research, Statistics

See more: critique paper, paper critique, write professional report, write critique, statistics paper, statistica, phd statistics, paper work, critique, questions statistics, statistics research report, statistics research paper, statistics research questions, report paper, paper report, due paper, research paper due, paper write, paper research, paper due, research paper degree, critique research report, statistics report, phd research, write improvement report

About the Employer:
( 42 reviews ) Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates

Project ID: #1278074

Awarded to:

Ohuma

Experienced statistician and reviewer here. See PMB for details

$250 USD in 3 days
(15 Reviews)
5.3

5 freelancers are bidding on average $127 for this job

WebDesignall

Hi I'm a math graduated with the best qualification, mi graduate final project was in statistics (using spss), i pass many courses about that and have my master degree in data analysis (once again i use spss), i wor More

$250 USD in 10 days
(41 Reviews)
6.5
geologistt

Hi! Pleasure to bid over here again. Please refer to PMB for sample and details thanks :)

$30 USD in 4 days
(58 Reviews)
5.8
malkabqlami6ka

Please see your msg

$30 USD in 1 day
(20 Reviews)
5.1
conatus

I understand the subject properly and can deliver this in a day

$75 USD in 1 day
(1 Review)
2.0