Search the Web for Something

Research into Hormones + Personality compatibility. ------------------- There are some personality classification systems that divide people in groups in accordance to hormones sensitivity/inclination. ------ For example: according to Dr. Victor Gulenko's DCNH subtype for Socionics, DOMINANT people (1 out of 4 types) are particularly sensible to Noradrenalin. Others types of people would be as called Normalizer, Harmonizer and Creative. Another example: according to Dr. Helen Fisher's '4 styles of behaving' people can be divided in 4 groups based on their inclination to either Dopamine, Serotonin, Testosterone, Estrogen system. ----------- Dr. Helen Fisher observed by analyzing data from [login to view URL] that Dopamine inclined people (generally more creative) are natural attracted to people of same type. In her words "curious, creative people needs people like themselves". While people expressive on the Serotonine, who according to her would tend to be traditional and conventional 'goes' for other people expressive on the Serotonine system. In other cases, people expressive on the Testosterone system (a more logical, decisive, direct person) goes for the opposite, someone higher on Estrogen (people with people skills, intuitive, and nurturing). So you see a compatibility pattern that she unveiled: Testosterone People - Estrogen People Serotonin People - Serotonin People Dopamine People - Dopamine People ------- Dr. Victor Gulenko developed a classification system of personality that divides people in 4 groups: Dominators, Normalizers, Creative and Harmonizers. Roughly we can see Fisher's Estrogen types description correlating to the description of Gulenko's Harmonizer types. Also a correlation between Dopamine types and Creative types. Serotonin types to Normalizer types. and Testosterone types to Dominator types. Only thing... According to his observations the compatibility goes as follows. Dominators - Normalizer Normalizer - Dominators Creative - Harmonizer Harmonizer - Creative. ------- So both has observed similar (but not same) behavior patterns in accordance to hormonal expressiveness in a person biological system. And those patterns correlate and can predict, according to them, the quality of interaction between a couple. Both systems talk about similar yet different compatibility aspects, since they do not correlate on both Dr. observations. While Gulenko's observation revealed a symmetrical opposition compatibility for each of the 4 types. Fisher's observation reveled a symmetrical opposition compatibility for only 2 types, while the remaining 2 are compatible by homoverted similarity. So, are they talking about the same stuff? Are they observing the same stuff or just similar? ------- I wish for you to find exactly what are the correlation Gulenko's make between Hormones and his Typology (DCNH subsystem for Socionics). Find what is his method of observation. I wish for you to find exactly what are the correlation Fisher's make between Hormones and his Typology. I wish for you to find any other correlation between Hormones and Personality, like Dr. Alexander Bukalov cites that there is a correlation between Hormones receptors formation and the formation of Socionics personality types. (not same as DCNH system or Fisher's system ). I wish for you to give me your analytical perspective on what are the similarities and diferences between these methods and observations. -------- Helen Fisher's [login to view URL] [login to view URL] Viktor Gulenko's [login to view URL] [login to view URL] Bukalov's [login to view URL] In this interview Bukalov cites a correlation between the 4 quadras in Socionics and Hormones inclination.