Edit the the paper according to the feedback

Dear experts, I had to write a paper on Storage and Management in Repositories with the following structure: - introduce repositories in digital preservation (including a motivation) - explain major functionality, in particular user interaction and workflows - management of these repositories and *specifically* management of its content over time - a typical technical architecture - some real life examples The written article is attached, but now I got a following feedback, according to which the paper should be edited. - remove the "history" part in the introduction, which is copied anyway. - the introduction is mostly unfocused: what is the actual problem, how does this lead to the development of (dig.) repositories, what part of the problem do / should repositories solve - sect. 2 needs major cleanup: remove *all* copied parts, use your own words. I don't see much value in 2.1 and 2.2, focus on the technical part and abstract problem setting. - remove (almost) all lists. simply listing features without putting them into a bigger context is of little value for the reader - sec 3. should be reworked and should build the base for sec. 4. focus should be on the general principles (workflows, life-cycles) and sec. 4 should only provide some practical examples. as you mentioned in the introduction, software isn't there for ever, hence, details of dSpace and Fedora are useful, but more important are the underlying principles (sec. 3). - sec. 4 should be much shorter, remove useless feature list. I need a freelancer to edit the paper, accordingly and make a paper of 8-9 pages singlespaced.